You are hereI Will Do Anything for Journalism, But I Won't Do That

I Will Do Anything for Journalism, But I Won't Do That


By Mike DeArmond - Posted on 09 September 2009

As a curmudgeon who has embraced many of the new technologies of journalism, I want to draw a line.

Let’s quit tweet, tweet, tweeting like the birdbrains do. I don’t care what your friend had for lunch. I don’t care how many people are following you through Twitter.com. Or Facebook, for that matter.

My intelligence drops just about every time I see a tweet pop up on a web page I frequent.

I really like Missouri basketball player Kimmie English. He’s a bright, intelligent, witty kid. He speaks in complete sentences. He expresses opinions clearly in person and I suspect, if he were to compose a letter - that old fashion form of communication that required a three-day wait before the people you sent your thoughts to perceive them - then all the words would be spelled correctly and I wouldn’t feel like I was trying to decipher some personal license plate like 10SNE1.

But even Kimmie can do better than something I saw linked on a message board today:

"If ur a student at mizzou.. And walk around campus in Alabama, Oklahoma or duke shirts.. Transfer.. Plz.. It ruins my day walking to class."

I really don’t object to the message so much as the medium.

I contribute to a blog - this one, obviously - and I don’t pretend blogs are the classic form of journalism.

I also do video logs and I’ll admit I take great liberties with those. Hey, when you’re 59 years old, have a face made for radio, you do strange things in front of a video camera.

The intention of those vlogs, quite frankly, is to entertain and sometimes to unstuff those so full of themselves that it hurts.

For that I routinely draw accusations that I am a drunk, a meth addict, ugly, stupid, working out of my bedroom in a sweatshirt I haven’t changed in years. Only part of which is true. While I used to be a handsome young devil of a man, I no longer am. I cherish my good fortune that my wife still is willing to appear with me in public.

Hey, it is what gets me through the vlogs. And the blogs. And the game stories and the sidebars and the notebooks. You don’t get to write about Missouri proving everybody else wrong by ripping Illinois in football all that often. Too often, you’re writing about a game with Furman. Or any game involving the Royals. Or Chiefs. Or soccer. Or curling. Hey. I’ve written stories about curling.

Perhaps it is that I find myself in the clutches of the same economic downturns as the rest of you. A five percent pay cut, an involuntary one-week furlough without pay. Hey, if you are in the newspaper industry, you’re just lucky you haven’t been put out to pasture with a severance package that is generally insulting to anyone who has spent more than 20 years working at the same place.

But I draw the line at Twitter. Like the TV commerical notes: “Dad, I know you’re on the porch.”

Please, quit sharing the smallest detail of your daily travail. In the quickest, easiest, least fulfilling way.

I became a journalist because I love words. The way they can be used to paint an image, to link observation and explanation.

It is why I think it is wonderful to write about how some questions are so rambling that they climb the wall, scoot around a corner, take a stop in the men’s restroom, and only then arrive at their intended point.

You can’t do that with Twitter. You’re limited to 140 characters. And most people waste even those.

Tweet. Tweet-Tweet. Tweet-Tweet.

To paraphrase Meat Loaf. I will do anything for journalism, but I won’t do that.


Posted in

I don't think Twitter can affect professional journalism very much, it affects only the language young people use to express themselves.

I'd gladly let her do more than she does. :)

Mike,

You took the words right out of my mouth. I couldn't have said it better. When I read this, I remembered every little thing as if it only happened yesterday.

But you know, you gotta do what you can and let Mother Nature do the rest.

Yours truly,

Wolf
(with the Red Roses)

i mostly agree with you on your main points...tweet is lame...journalism is 'changing'...but it's not all useless or hopeless...so, mostly, i agree...and 2 out of 3 ain't bad.

After watching the Ron Zook Show on FSN Midwest St. Louis yesterday, I think there must be a big mistake; it was obvious from the show that Illinois won the game easily. Zook said the transition from one set of asst. coaches to the present set had been "smooth". An Illini player was lauded for having gained 38 yards rushing, total. The "Illini Blitz" highlights demonstrated that Mizzou was absolutely overwhelmed. Honestly, I'm now beginning to wonder if man has been to the moon, or not. Talk about lipstick on a pig!!! Like a dodo in a clown suit (i.e., the Jayhawk), only worse.

But the J-Hoax are all a-twitter about beating another off-the-charts team! (I'm drinking black coffee as I compose my gratuitous quasijournalistic gems, while out in the Pathetic Prairie Province they're drinking that K-Who Kool-Aid....)

http://www.zazzle.com/kansas+bashing+gifts

Hey Mike,

I love and really appreciate your work, but I think you're only seeing one of the things people use Twitter for and characterizing the entire service based on that assumption.

What I, and many others, use Twitter for is an aggregator of whatever information you're looking for. I could do a search for Mizzou and get links to stories of yours from the Star, Dave Matter's with the Trib, the Missourian, the Poz if he covered them, Whitlock's crush, etc. Instead of going to each individual site, if you follow those writers/news outlets, you get the stories/columns as they're posted. Easy and efficient.

Also, you can happen across writers or stories you normally wouldn't have seen. When people you track "Retweet" something (posting the other person's original message) you sometimes get a story, are introduced to a great writer, interesting stat, whatever, that you wouldn't have come across otherwise.

Are the people who post minutia obnoxious and self-absorbed? Of course. But the service really can be a great tool for those in media.

Just some thoughts to be considered. :)

-Ryan

Twitter is not for me. I want stuff when I want it, not when someone else sends it to me quasi-univited. For that I have office e-mail.

:)